By Bolaji Peters (SIWES student, Polytechnic Iresi)
In Nigeria, amidst rising crime rates, the debate over civilian access to firearms intensifies. Advocates argue that empowering citizens to defend themselves is paramount, given the government’s perceived failure to ensure security. However, concerns loom over potential repercussions, including increased violence and vigilante justice.
This call for liberalized gun control isn’t new and has garnered support from prominent figures like governors and senators. Proponents cite self-defense, deterrence, and cultural parallels to justify their stance. Analogies to the U.S. Second Amendment and Islamic principles of self-defense are invoked to bolster arguments.
Former governor Masari underscores the religious and moral dimensions of self-defense, while others advocate for parity between criminals and law-abiding citizens. Drawing inspiration from the U.S., some argue for constitutional guarantees on firearm ownership.
Senator Ned Nwoko’s proposed bill epitomizes this ongoing discourse, awaiting deliberation in the National Assembly. Yet, amidst these deliberations, the overarching question remains: should the nation’s collective well-being supersede individual rights to bear arms?
